Insured or Uninsured—and Can the Defendant Pay Your Texas Crash Damages?

Carabin Shaw is one of the leading personal injury law firms in Texas. They have extensive experience in accident cases, focusing on securing compensation for clients’ medical bills, property damage, and pain and suffering.

Insured or Uninsured—and Can the Defendant Pay Your Texas Crash Damages?

At least one in four Texas drivers don’t carry auto liability insurance. That single fact can decide whether your claim gets paid quickly, gets bogged down in disputes, or never produces a dollar you can collect. Texas law requires every driver to carry liability coverage, and law enforcement now uses real-time databases to identify uninsured vehicles, often leading to on-the-spot towing and ticketing. Yet despite the mandate, uninsured and underinsured drivers remain a reality after serious crashes.

Why the defendant’s insurance status matters

Whether the at-fault driver has insurance often dictates the path and potential outcome of your claim. If coverage exists, there’s at least a pathway to recovery from a policy. If there’s no coverage, your claim targets the driver’s personal assets—raising tough questions about whether that person has the money to satisfy a judgment. Even with insurance, payment isn’t automatic or easy. Without it, collectability becomes the central issue.

More from our San Antonio car accident lawyers here

When both drivers are insured

If you and the other driver both carry liability insurance, that is generally a positive starting point. It means funds should be available once fault and damages are established. The challenge, however, often lies in how much insurance exists and how hard the insurer fights to limit what it pays.

Texas minimum liability limits may fall short

Many drivers carry only the bare minimum “street legal” coverage. In Texas, the minimum limits are $30,000 for bodily injury to one person and $25,000 for property damage per crash. Those numbers rarely cover the true cost of a serious collision. Medical care can escalate quickly, and many vehicles on today’s roads are worth more than $25,000 without accounting for upgrades or valuable property inside the car. When losses exceed the policy, the insurer pays up to the limit—and the rest becomes your problem unless another source of recovery exists.

Getting paid isn’t automatic just because insurance exists

Insurance money on paper doesn’t equal money in your hands. Carriers differ in how quickly they investigate and pay. Some adjusters delay, dispute fault, or question the necessity of medical treatment. Behind those tactics are teams of defense attorneys, reconstruction consultants, and investigators tasked with minimizing payouts. Expect pushback on liability, causation, and damages. The better prepared your claim, the stronger your leverage.

To move a claim forward, you need organized evidence, clear medical documentation, and a well-supported damages calculation. You also need to avoid pitfalls that carriers exploit, such as casual recorded statements, social media posts that can be spun against you, or gaps in treatment that get framed as proof your injuries aren’t serious. Prompt, strategic action helps counter delay tactics and preserves your rights under deadlines that govern injury claims in Texas.

If the other driver is uninsured

There’s a substantial chance the other driver carried no coverage at all. If you purchased uninsured motorist (UM) protection, your own policy can step in to pay certain losses up to your UM limits, subject to the terms of your contract. Without UM coverage, your path is a direct claim against the at-fault driver personally—raising the question of solvency and collectability.

Solvency means the defendant has sufficient assets or income to pay your damages. An insolvent defendant cannot satisfy a judgment, no matter how strong your case is on liability. Pursuing litigation against someone who cannot pay often results in a paper judgment with little real-world value. That is a harsh reality many victims face when the at-fault driver is both uninsured and unable to satisfy a judgment.

Solvency and collectability: the crucial assessment

Even when you win in court, collecting depends on the defendant’s resources. You may explore wage garnishment, bank levies, or liens on non-exempt property. But Texas law protects certain assets, and a person with limited income or no attachable property may be effectively judgment-proof. Before investing time and money in a lawsuit against an uninsured driver, a careful assessment of collectability helps you decide whether litigation is worth pursuing, or whether to focus on your own policy benefits and other potential sources of recovery.

Timing matters. Defendants can move assets, spend down accounts, or change employment. A prompt solvency review creates a snapshot of what may be available and informs strategy—such as pursuing a quick settlement, securing a lien, or pivoting to alternative coverage sources if they exist.

Hidden assets and evasive tactics

Some drivers take steps to appear insolvent after a wreck. They might transfer assets to relatives, shuffle funds between accounts, or try to conceal the crash from a carrier that is poised to non-renew their policy after one more claim. These moves complicate recovery but don’t always put assets out of reach.

If you suspect concealment, experienced counsel can investigate and trace assets. The auto injury attorneys at our Texas Law Firm can perform an asset check on an accident defendant to estimate net worth and identify potential sources of recovery. If there’s money available, a targeted legal strategy—demand letters, preservation notices, early filings, and, when appropriate, post-judgment discovery—can help secure your fair share.

Practical steps after a collision to protect your claim

  • Document the scene: Photograph vehicle damage, road conditions, skid marks, traffic signs, and any visible injuries. Capture wide shots and close-ups.
  • Gather information: Obtain the other driver’s name, address, license, and insurance details; note the make, model, and license plate; get contact information for witnesses.
  • Seek medical care: Prompt evaluation creates a medical record that links injuries to the crash and can reveal harm that isn’t obvious at the scene.
  • Notify your insurer: Report the crash within your policy’s time limits. Ask about coverage that may apply, such as UM/UIM or medical payments.
  • Preserve evidence: Keep damaged property, repair estimates, medical bills, diagnostic reports, and employment records showing lost income.
  • Be cautious with statements: Decline recorded statements to the other driver’s insurer until you’ve spoken with counsel. Stick to facts at the scene and avoid speculation about fault.
  • Track all losses: Log mileage for medical visits, out-of-pocket costs, time missed from work, and how injuries affect daily activities.
  • Mind deadlines: Texas has statutes of limitations and notice requirements. Missing a deadline can end a claim regardless of merit.

How seasoned counsel can improve your outcome

Lawyers who handle motor vehicle injury cases every day know where recovery often hides and how to marshal evidence that compels payment. They can identify all applicable policies, push for disclosure of policy limits, and evaluate whether other liable parties exist. They can coordinate experts to strengthen liability and damages, negotiate from a position of strength, and file suit if the carrier refuses to make a fair offer.

When the other driver is uninsured or appears insolvent, counsel can scrutinize assets, pursue post-judgment remedies where viable, and guide you toward the most practical recovery path—whether that is a settlement within insurance limits, a structured plan to collect from the defendant, or a pivot to your own coverages. Strategic advocacy often means the difference between a stalled claim and a concrete recovery.

Talk through your options with a free consultation

You don’t have to guess whether the at-fault driver has coverage, whether policy limits will be enough, or whether an uninsured defendant can satisfy a judgment. A focused early review clarifies your best path forward. To learn more about how insurance status and solvency affect your case—and to map a strategy tailored to your situation—contact Carabin Shaw Law Firm today for a free consultation.

Getting Your Fair Share of Mesothelioma Compensation

How Can I Get My Fair Share of Mesothelioma Compensation?

Recovering fair compensation for asbestos disease starts with understanding how the money is held and who competes for it. In a mass tort, the judge in the representative case will often order that funds be placed in trust pending the resolution of future claims, and a San Antonio mesothelioma attorney works within that structure to protect a client’s place in line. When money has already been set aside, some complications ease, but the process never becomes simple. Courts follow exacting procedures, and a single misstep can see a lawsuit dismissed before it begins.

Competition for those funds is a real concern, and it is one a San Antonio mesothelioma attorney watches closely. Most mass torts eventually exhaust a defendant’s ability to pay every claimant. Asbestos litigation is partly an exception, because so many defendants have been identified over the decades. A few remain in business, but most closed long ago. As those companies liquidated under the weight of decades of asbestos claims, their assets were placed in hundreds of trusts that continue to pay mesothelioma awards to this day.

That structure turns many claims into a race against the clock, which is why a San Antonio mesothelioma attorney moves quickly to file and document a case. Just as important is proving up your damages, the legal work of demonstrating the full value of your losses. Mass torts often grow competitive among similar claimants, so aggressive and well-prepared representation is what keeps your interests from being passed over in favor of someone else’s claim.

The Paths to Compensation

A person diagnosed with mesothelioma usually has more than one avenue for recovery, and the right combination depends on the facts. One path runs through the employer that allowed the asbestos exposure. In Texas, that route involves the workers’ compensation system, which is complicated and can, in the worst circumstances, leave a plaintiff with less than full compensation. It does not always work out poorly, though, and an experienced work injury attorney can help determine whether this venue serves your interests.

A second path leads to the asbestos trust funds. Large corporations in construction, shipbuilding, and asbestos mining established these trusts for the people their products harmed. When a patient can prove employment and a physician attests that asbestos likely caused the cancer, a trust claim can be a relatively direct way to secure at least some compensation. The picture changes with smaller companies, or with military exposure, since the military does not recognize every type of asbestos-related mesothelioma. In those situations, a civil legal claim is often the strongest option.

Why Experienced Representation Matters

Specialized legal services, particularly thorough investigation of where and when the exposure happened, can help a plaintiff reach a fairly negotiated settlement without the delay of a trial. Depending on the facts, six-figure settlements are not unusual, though the specific details of each case dictate the actual amount. No reputable attorney can promise a number in advance, because the value of a claim turns on the exposure history, the diagnosis, and the losses involved.

The volume of regulation and procedure surrounding asbestos litigation can overwhelm anyone without legal training. The advantage is that the case law is deeply established, built from hundreds of thousands of claims spanning decades. An experienced attorney can draw on that body of law to construct the case a client needs. Major defendants in these cases are familiar with the attorneys who prepare seriously and litigate well, and they often negotiate in good faith rather than face a courtroom against counsel who are ready to try the case.

Choosing the Right Attorney for a Complex Claim

Mesothelioma is not an ordinary personal injury matter. A claim requires an attorney skilled in product liability, comfortable with the mechanics of mass torts, and experienced in arguing civil cases that cross jurisdictional lines. Those three skills rarely overlap in a general practice, which is why patients are wise to ask pointed questions about a firm’s background before signing on. The goal is representation that treats your diagnosis as a unique case rather than one more file in a large inventory.

Depending on the circumstances, compensation may be pursued through a personal injury lawsuit while the patient is living or a wrongful death lawsuit brought by surviving family members. Each route has its own proof requirements and deadlines, and the strategy should be tailored to the patient’s health, the available defendants, and the trusts that may apply. The litigation can feel complex and confusing, but the right legal team turns that complexity into a clear plan for recovery.

Take the Next Step

A mesothelioma diagnosis is frightening, and the legal system should not add to that burden. The companies that allowed asbestos exposure built the trusts and faced the verdicts precisely because patients and families stood up and pursued their claims. With sound guidance, you can do the same and secure compensation tied to your actual losses rather than a figure decided for a faceless group.

If you or someone in your family has been diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure, do not let those responsible go unanswered. Contact our experienced mesothelioma attorneys today for a free, no-obligation consultation, and let us help you seek the compensation and justice you deserve.

Can a Family File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit After a Fatal Crosswalk Accident in Austin?

Can a Pedestrian’s Family File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Austin After a Fatal Crosswalk Accident?

When a pedestrian is killed in an Austin crosswalk, the grief is overwhelming — and it is made worse by the knowledge that this death was preventable. A crosswalk is supposed to be the safest place for a person on foot, and when a driver blows through one and takes a life, the family has every right to seek justice. The Austin pedestrian accident lawyers at Shaw Cowart have helped families across Texas file wrongful death lawsuits after fatal crosswalk crashes, and they can guide your family through every step of the process.

Texas wrongful death law gives the surviving family members of a person killed by another party’s negligence the right to file a civil lawsuit for compensation. This is completely separate from any criminal charges the driver may face, and the outcome of the criminal case does not determine the outcome of the wrongful death claim. The personal injury lawyers at Shaw Cowart have been representing families in these cases for 34 years. They understand the Texas wrongful death statute, the damages that are available, and the tactics insurance companies use to minimize what they pay to grieving families.

Austin recorded 99 traffic fatalities in 2025, and pedestrian deaths made up a disproportionate share of that number. Multiple pedestrians were killed in crosswalks — the very places they had every right to expect safety. Pedestrian accident attorneys who handle wrongful death cases know that these families deserve more than sympathy. They deserve full and fair compensation under Texas law.

Texas Wrongful Death Law — What Families Need to Know

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Texas

Under Chapter 71 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, three categories of family members have the right to bring a wrongful death claim: the surviving spouse of the deceased, the children of the deceased (both biological and adopted), and the parents of the deceased. These family members can file individually or together as a group. If none of these family members file a lawsuit within three months of the death, the executor or administrator of the estate may file on behalf of the estate — unless a family member objects.

What Damages Are Available

A wrongful death lawsuit in Texas allows the surviving family to recover several categories of damages. Loss of companionship and society compensates for the loss of the love, comfort, and emotional support the deceased provided. Mental anguish covers the severe emotional pain and suffering the family endures. Loss of financial support accounts for the income and financial contributions the deceased would have provided over their lifetime. Loss of care, maintenance, and services covers the household contributions, childcare, and guidance the deceased provided. Funeral and burial expenses are also recoverable.

The Survival Action — A Separate but Related Claim

In addition to the wrongful death claim, Texas law allows a survival action on behalf of the deceased person’s estate. This claim recovers damages for the pain and suffering the victim experienced between the time of the crash and the time of their death. If the pedestrian was conscious and suffered before dying — even for minutes or hours — the estate can seek compensation for that suffering. In cases where a victim survives for days in a hospital before succumbing to their injuries, the survival action damages can be significant.

The Statute of Limitations

Texas imposes a two-year statute of limitations on wrongful death claims, measured from the date of the victim’s death. If the family does not file the lawsuit within two years, the claim is permanently barred. Two years may sound like a long time, but evidence disappears quickly after a fatal crash. The pedestrian accident attorneys at Shaw Cowart begin investigating immediately to preserve every piece of evidence that supports the family’s claim.

The Heather Smith Act — A Texas Law Born from a Crosswalk Death

In 2017, Heather Smith was killed while walking her child to school in a crosswalk. Her death led to the passage of a Texas law that requires police officers to file a special crash report within 10 days for any collision involving injury, death, or $1,000 or more in property damage. The law was intended to improve accountability and data collection for crashes that harm vulnerable road users.

But a City of Austin audit found that enforcement of this requirement has been inconsistent. APD responded to more than 85,000 traffic crash calls between September 2021 and July 2025, and officers did not file a crash report in more than half of those cases, according to the Austin Monitor. This gap in reporting can leave families without critical evidence unless their lawyers independently investigate the crash.

Recent Fatal Crosswalk Crashes in Austin

On January 5, 2026, 60-year-old Donna Michelle Hanson was struck and killed in a marked crosswalk on East Koenig Lane at approximately 2 a.m. The driver fled the scene. APD identified the suspect vehicle as a dark BMW 323 and is asking for the public’s help. On Christmas Eve 2025, 35-year-old Joseph Capulong Katigbak was struck at the intersection of West Cesar Chavez Street and Sandra Muraida Way at 5:55 p.m. and died on Christmas morning. In both cases, the families of the deceased have the right to pursue wrongful death claims.

Criminal Case vs. Civil Case — They Are Separate

Many families believe they must wait for the criminal case to finish before they can file a wrongful death lawsuit. This is not true. The civil claim and the criminal case operate independently with different standards of proof. A criminal conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. A civil wrongful death claim requires only a preponderance of the evidence — meaning it is more likely than not that the driver’s negligence caused the death. Families have successfully recovered wrongful death damages even in cases where the criminal charges were dropped or the driver was acquitted.

Dram Shop Liability — When the Bar or Restaurant Shares Blame

If the driver who killed your loved one was intoxicated and had been served alcohol at a bar, restaurant, or event, Texas dram shop law may make that establishment liable as well. Under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, an establishment that serves alcohol to a person who is obviously intoxicated can be held responsible for damages caused by that person’s intoxication. This is a separate claim from the one against the driver and can provide an additional source of recovery for the family.

The wrongful death attorneys at Shaw Cowart will investigate every potential source of liability and fight to hold every responsible party accountable. If your family has lost a loved one in a pedestrian crosswalk crash in Austin, the consultation is free and there is no fee unless they win. If you have a legal question — call us at 512-842-7085.

Here are more locations we serve around Austin, Texas
a href=”https://www.shawcowart.com/cedar-park-car-accident-lawyer/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Cedar Park
George Town
Hutto
Kyle
Leander
Pflugerville
Round Rock
San Marcos